September 5, 2007

Dave’s “broken” Britain: Part 1

Filed under: Broken Society — admin @ 2:12 am

The very simple message that “Dave” is trying to hammer into the public consciousness is the concept that society is broken. The whole campaign is based on these five points;

  1. There are five million people of working age not in work
  2. The poorest people in Britain have got poorer under Labour
  3. There are more young people not in work or full-time education than ten years ago
  4. We have one of the highest rates of family breakdown in Europe
  5. Most European countries recognise marriage in their tax system; Britain doesn’t

This is the most despicable - and entirely predictable - scaremongering that the Tories have come out with in recent years, except perhaps perhaps their “immigrants are evil” recitative to which they return every time their polls dip a little.

So - 5m working age people not in work. Well what does the Office for National Statistics say about this? The best figure to use is perhaps the number of jobs as an indication of the health of the working economy.

stats1.gif

So according to ONS data - and these stats above start at the beginning of the Major Government, we have more jobs in this country than ever before.

Yes, there should be more Dave, but not broken, and a lot better than any Tory government ever achieved - ever.

I have to go to work now - and play my part in the factual triumph over Dave’s lies - but I shall be back to look at the rest of Dave’s “Broken” Britain. In the meantime Dave, don’t be gloomy - “Let sunshine rule the day!”

1 Comment »

  1. Even my fairly untrained eye can see that there is no correlation between Spam’s statement and your graph. Or perhaps you can explain how it refutes his statement? Many of those jobs may have gone to Poles etc.

    Secondly, is it possible to get a breakdown of how many of these newly created jobs are real jobs and how many are public sector non-jobs?

    I’m no economist but my initial thought is that job creation is a fairly crude method of measuring economic health. A better way, surely, is to look at the number of bankruptcies. Any data on those?

    Best regards

    Comment by G Smith — September 5, 2007 @ 6:30 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment